o_O.Q said:
dahuman said:
o_O.Q said:
dahuman said:
o_O.Q said:
Galaki said:
HappySqurriel said:
I don't think we're talking about the same thing ...
Everytime the rumours about the Wii U have changed you can see the opinions of some people flip-flop between "The Wii U being more powerful is meaningless because the HD consoles are good enough anyways" and "The Wii U is garbage because it is not dramatically more powerful than the HD consoles"
|
You must be new to vgc, but let me explain to you "our" train of thoughts.
720P graphics on PS3 is awesome. ( in 2006 )
720P grahpics on Xbox360 is meh. ( 2005 )
720P graphics on WiiU is garbage. ( years later in 2012 )
Okay, now that you're up to speed, continue discussion.
|
fixed i added some context... i personally don't understand how some people expect people who've owned HD consoles to be impressed with a visual showing that is just on par or slightly ( from what we've seen ) better than what they've been seeing on the consoles they already own.
the only thing that nintendo has shown so far to truly differentiate the wii u is of course the tablet controller and while some of the capabilities they've shown are interesting ( like accessing an inventory from the tablet ) the overall presentation was lacking... then theres also the fact that the wii u as a games platform unlike the wii isn't completely unique :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpQ7GamEfnI
so far people are imo justified in being skeptical
|
lets get something straight here, how much does an ipad2 cost? how much does apple air tv cost? how good does that real racing 2 look to you? how do I use wifi on the ipad2 when it's playing that thing? coocoo for coco puffs yo.
|
yes even though the price hasn't been announced for wii u we can be fairly certain that the ipad, air tv etc will be a more costly solution... that is if you hadn't already owned an ipad... but the point i was going for is that the wii at that period in time was completely unique but the wii u to the average consumer is going to seem very similar to tablets already on the market especially since they are getting streaming features now then theres the added advantage of being able to carry tablets anywhere with you
|
You are asking that every house hold to have a reciever type device in which first, they'd need to all have the tablet that comes with a reciever device, second, to be all compatible with each other, third, to up the cost of the overall due to that, that's not how computing works. And if my handheld has only a multi-touch screen, I'll murder somebody, because that's definitely no the best gaming solution at all. Oh, and local multi-player would require four 600 dollar tablets or more, in which I ask, "huh?"
|
im just saying that unlike before with the wii the wii u isn't a completely original concept
"Oh, and local multi-player would require four 600 dollar tablets or more" in terms of the wii u i was wondering the same thing... how will multiplayer games that don't support wiimotes work? ( like tekken 2 player or CoD 4 player )
|
sure as hell won't be 600 dollars per controller =P and of course the Wii U isn't original, it's like a bigger DS with a second screen that you can move lol, and I've been using my phone as a remote on my PC for awhile now with remote desktop. Motion control wasn't new either when the Wii came out, but the question is really can they pack all the features they want into the sku at a good price for the masses and have good advertisement and games, and that's where the business is at.
