S.T.A.G.E. said:
Bonus Round Scores for E3: Microsoft: Jeff: C Andy: C- Nguy: B+ Sony: Nguy: A- (because of new hardware), Andy: C (Thought Sony and Microsoft would've tied had it not been for kinect also more interesting games and the successful pricing of the PSVita on Sonys part), C+ Nintendo: Nguy: A Andy: B Jeff: B They never said anything about 360 having a better conference. They said it was too kinect heavy, especially to the market they were showing off games to at E3. Don't get me started on the Invisible Walls show. Lets just say some 360 fans were pissed off at some words that were said during E3 about Microsofts conference. They knew full well Microsoft wasnt focused on the core. |
Nowhere do they say specifically PS3 > 360.
- Nguy says he only gave Sony a better score then Microsoft as a whole because of PSV.
- Andy basically said PS3=360, except PSV saved Sony, and even with PSV, if MS put less emphasis on Kinect, they could have tied
- Jeff is the same story. New hardware made the Sony Press Conference better.
No one states that PS3 > 360 except for a few forum members. No large scale review agency, no nothing. The reason why this thread was created was likely to adress why forum users think PS3/Wii > 360.
What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database 
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results













