mibuokami said:
Michael-5 said:
mibuokami said:
Michael-5 said:
Consumers all around said Microsoft had a worse E3 press conference then Sony and Nintendo, but you're bending the truth to make the PS3 look better then it is.
Nowhere online does it say the PS3 and Wii portion of Sony's and Nintendo's Press conferences were better then MS's press conference (remember Sony and Nintendo have 4 consoles to talk about, MS only has the 360). In fact when you watch Bonus Round, or any other major websites, people say the Wii portion of Nintendo's press conference was just an all out dissapointment, and most people say 360 > PS3. Just look at this thread too, you are one of the few people arguing PS3 > 360.
So in conclusion Sony/Nintendo >> Microsoft, but 360>PS3>>>Wii
|
I don't get this....
Let's review the title: Explain to me how PS3 and Wii had better E3 than 360
Now this statement: Nowhere online does it say the PS3 and Wii portion of Sony's and Nintendo's Press conferences were better then MS's press conference
Sooo.... you want people to explain how the PS3 / Wii had a better conference than the 360, then claim no one is actually making a statement indicating that PS3 / Wii had a better conference than the 360.
Who are you trying to refute then?
Who are these people specifically singling out 360, PS3 and Wii performance and claiming that the 360 had worst showing?
|
Lots of PS3 fans on this site, so OP may be in regards to forum comments, but I don't read anywhere, who honestly thought Wii was better then PS3 or 360.
Also I didn't make the thread, so ask thx1139 these questions.
I claim large scale professional websites and the journalists among them never said PS3 had a better press conference then 360.
STAGE watches Bonus Round, so I was just pointing out in Bonus Round itself they said the same thing. 360 debatably had a better press conference then Sony themselves. If you really hate Kinect and Halo, then I can see why someone like STAGE would prefer PS3, but he shouldn't just crop out all the core Kinect titles and limit the 360 core lineup to a couple games this fall and Halo, and then crop out Halo 4 since it's released in fall 2012 (like Starhawk and other PS3 games).
|
I see a lot of people claiming Sony had a better press conference than MS, I also saw a lot of pissed off 360 fan (and a lot of troll) hate on the MS conference due to kinect. Who are claiming spefically PS3 > 360?
Regardless I see that I too made a mistake, you didn't start the thread.
|
Everyone has their own preferences, not a fan of Kinect either, but I don't ignore the Kinect games just because they don't appeal to me. Some look pretty cool, but they don't justify the purchase of a camera that costs as much as a console. MS has shifted its marketing strategy heavily, but it's mainly to keep the system fresh. They didn't expect to have an extended console life like this. Personally I'd rather have them invest less in Kinect, and put some money into Rare to make a good new Conker or Killer Instinct title.
Also, I only see one or two people claiming PS3 > 360 at this E3. There is STAGE and....that's it in this thread. It's fine to have your own preference, Wii, 360, and PS3 all failed to announce too many good new games. Just don't say one is better then the other because of all the games to competition offers, are not your type. The Wii games I am interested in weren't talked about at this E3, and Sony really only showed Uncharted 3 for PS3, but I don't go rubbing around the IMO superrior 360 upcoming lineup.
I just hate ignorance, some people can be pretty dumb (not pointing fingers), and I hate ignorant people ignore facts, but think they are right and press on it...
