By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
mibuokami said:
Michael-5 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
selnor said:
The thread is rediculous because we are on vgsony. I mean vgchart
Anything against Sony is met in force by 80% of the sites users.


The consensus all around is that Microsoft lost E3. They marketed it to the core and most sites and people rated it Nintendo> Sony> Microsoft or Sony> Nintendo> Microsoft. It's not just this site. If we're talking about the general audience of people who dont really game and would game casually then Nintendo>Microsoft>Sony. It's that simple.

Consumers all around said Microsoft had a worse E3 press conference then Sony and Nintendo, but you're bending the truth to make the PS3 look better then it is.

Nowhere online does it say the PS3 and Wii portion of Sony's and Nintendo's Press conferences were better then MS's press conference (remember Sony and Nintendo have 4 consoles to talk about, MS only has the 360). In fact when you watch Bonus Round, or any other major websites, people say the Wii portion of Nintendo's press conference was just an all out dissapointment, and most people say 360 > PS3. Just look at this thread too, you are one of the few people arguing PS3 > 360.

So in conclusion Sony/Nintendo >> Microsoft, but 360>PS3>>>Wii

I don't get this....

Let's review the title: Explain to me how PS3 and Wii had better E3 than 360

Now this statement: Nowhere online does it say the PS3 and Wii portion of Sony's and Nintendo's Press conferences were better then MS's press conference

Sooo.... you want people to explain how the PS3 / Wii had a better conference than the 360, then claim no one is actually making a statement indicating that PS3 / Wii had a better conference than the 360.

Who are you trying to refute then?

Who are these people specifically singling out 360, PS3 and Wii performance and claiming that the 360 had worst showing?


Lots of PS3 fans on this site, so OP may be in regards to forum comments, but I don't read anywhere, who honestly thought Wii was better then PS3 or 360.

Also I didn't make the thread, so ask thx1139 these questions.

I claim large scale professional websites and the journalists among them never said PS3 had a better press conference then 360.

STAGE watches Bonus Round, so I was just pointing out in Bonus Round itself they said the same thing. 360 debatably had a better press conference then Sony themselves. If you really hate Kinect and Halo, then I can see why someone like STAGE would prefer PS3, but he shouldn't just crop out all the core Kinect titles and limit the 360 core lineup to a couple games this fall and Halo, and then crop out Halo 4 since it's released in fall 2012 (like Starhawk and other PS3 games).



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results