selnor said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
selnor said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
selnor said:
The thread is rediculous because we are on vgsony. I mean vgchart
Anything against Sony is met in force by 80% of the sites users. |
The consensus all around is that Microsoft lost E3. They marketed it to the core and most sites and people rated it Nintendo> Sony> Microsoft or Sony> Nintendo> Microsoft. It's not just this site. If we're talking about the general audience of people who dont really game and would game casually then Nintendo>Microsoft>Sony. It's that simple.
|
I couldn't care.
Goty so far?
Child of Eden. Unbelievable experience. Best motion controlled game ever and immersion like nothing else.
I'll go back to my goty now.
|
If you didnt care you wouldnt have labeled people. Plain and simple.
|
I explained to the people saying it was rediculous thread why. Not because I cared.
Ah what's the use.
|
The question of the thread was asking why the gamer consensus that the PS3 and Wii had a better showing than the 360 at E3. It wasnt just Sony. It was a good question. People gave reasons. Microsoft forgot that when they are showing games off its mainly the core whom are mainly watching. Unless they are showing off new hardware the casuals will not notice. This is why kinect had such a good year last year. Yahoo, google, late night tv and news stations all aired the new hardware for casuals last year. This year?...all nintendo. Casuals dont care about vita.
