9/11 was a conspiracy not a conspiracy theory

[Porcupine_I]

Metallicube said:

Porcupine_I said:

Rath said:

Porcupine_I said:
I don't know why conspiracy theories always have to be so complicated!

if the government was involved in ANY way, i would picture it like this:

"Mister President we have information about a planned Terrorist attack on the United States"

"Terrorist attack? Bombs huh? Well, i was looking for a excuse to wage war anyway, we stand down and let them do their thing and see what happens"

*WTC goes down*

WTF i didn't expect THAT!

I know right? I mean blowing up the building using thermite (or actually pretty much any explosive, thermite seems popular though) would require many people to plant the explosives, never being noticed by anybody, everybody who went into the building to ignore the telltale signs of thermite, the vast majority of structural engineers in the world to ignore that the buildings didn't fall as expected (as it stands the vast majority say the buildings fell as expected) and also for there to be a succesful terrorist attack.

Whereas the CIA ignoring the potential threat only involves the intelligence community and perhaps the White House. Why can't conspiracy theorists pick the somwhat reasonable conspiracy over the 'what the fuck?' conspiracy?

 

Also why do people post videos of an architect talking about the collapse like he's an expert? Architects are more on the artistic side of building design than structural.

that's the problem with these conspiracy theories. they explain everything from a technical side, but they do not explain why it had to be so awfully complicated. Why would anyone go through all that hassle od staging a terrorist attack, that was , in there own words" not possible in this way", if anyone could figure it out by watching videos.

and frankly i have lost the overview a long time ago. did the planes even exist? why collape another WTC building when the twin towers would have been enough to make a point?

i wonder if anyone in this thread had ever personally talked to someone who had been in the building that day.

Admittedly this is pure speculation, but it is my opinion that WTC7 was the control center for the 9/11 false flag operation, as it had communications with major airports as well as the pentagon. Also, as I mentioned, there were numerous documents housed in that building involving investigations on insider trading and other corporate scandels including Enron. Not to mention, there is the fat juciy insurance policy covering terrorism, purchased by Silverstein.

Why go through the hassle?

- Well for one, it allows for major support of two wars; Afghanistan and Iraq, which probably wouldn't have been possible without the pretext of 9/11 to legitimize the, tightening the grip on the oil, establishing a base in the Middle East, and allowing for major profits for arms sales.

- Then there is the establishment of homeland security, and the stripping of US liberties and the Patriot Act, again under the pretext of 9/11

- Also, the WTC complex were beginning to become large albatrosses, between the issue of asbestos removal, and the growing number of vacant offices. The towers were hemorrhaging money.

- A disaster such as this unites support under the president, and his approval rating skyrockets.

- The seizure of gold underneath the towers

- The claims of $4 billion of insurance money by Silverstein

- The put options on the companies of the planes that hit the towers

Look up "The Project for a new American Century" to find out more about their agenda

Also, research Operation Northwoods and The Gulf of Tonkin Incident, and you'll discover that false flag operations are certainly nothing new as a means of uniting people into supporting new wars and policies - in fact, if you know your history, you'll find that it is the norm.

sure, i know all about these claims

what i don't understand is why make that terrorist attack so overly complicated? why employ literally thousands of people needed for this kind of operation and make them somehow shut up afterwards? don't you think that is a bit silly?