Rath said:
Whereas the CIA ignoring the potential threat only involves the intelligence community and perhaps the White House. Why can't conspiracy theorists pick the somwhat reasonable conspiracy over the 'what the fuck?' conspiracy?
Also why do people post videos of an architect talking about the collapse like he's an expert? Architects are more on the artistic side of building design than structural. |
that's the problem with these conspiracy theories. they explain everything from a technical side, but they do not explain why it had to be so awfully complicated. Why would anyone go through all that hassle od staging a terrorist attack, that was , in there own words" not possible in this way", if anyone could figure it out by watching videos.
and frankly i have lost the overview a long time ago. did the planes even exist? why collape another WTC building when the twin towers would have been enough to make a point?
i wonder if anyone in this thread had ever personally talked to someone who had been in the building that day.
“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”
- George Orwell, ‘1984’







