Explain to me how PS3 and Wii had better E3 than 360

[Michael-5]

S.T.A.G.E. said:

 

Fine....add the non-AAA and casual titles to  a list. I doubt that will help any in anyones argument against Sony when comparing it to Microsoft. It actually makes things worse. The majority of Sonys titles are on the core front where as Microsofts are mainly on the casual, so that makes it ten times worse. The core get thrown like 2-3 shooters a year from Microsoft to keep them happy. I need variety in my life on a core front. I dont compare AAA's for fun you know. I do it because I became accustomed to how people compare years of their consoles by throwing out the highly rated and high budget titles. In truth this is more accurate because they are the draw of the console. Hell...thats the reason there is even the name AAA. When you look at gamestops website, its all AAA offerings on the front page because the bulk of their money comes from that.

Wait....what AAA titles does Sony have coming out? The only high profile game announced at E3 this year was Halo 4, did I miss something big?

If you only debated core AAA games, then MS psns Sony. Forza 4, Gears 3, The Witcher 2, and Halo 4 next year, and Sony has Uncharted 3, Resistance 3 and The Last Guardian next year. However, like I always say, 1 or two game difference, who gives a hoothoot.

Thing is you debate "core" games, but then ignore "core" games that you're not interested in. Fable: The Journey, and Ryse being key ones. Also casual or not, Just Dance 2 is a fun ass game, and definatly should count in any silly comparisions. You complain about 360 not having enough variety, and then you dismiss the variety given, make up your mind.