Explain to me how PS3 and Wii had better E3 than 360

[Michael-5]

Lostplanet22 said:

lurkerwithnosoul said:

Gojimaster said:
Are you guys even that excited about Halo 4 after the disappointment that was Halo Reach?

 

Halo Reach was no disappointment. And, by that logic, no one should be excited for PSV after the disappointment PSP was.

 

Anyway, i agree with the OP. Xbox 360 had the best games of the 3.

You have hardly touched Halo Reach

http://www.bungie.net/Stats/Reach/Default.aspx?player=irkenkats&sg=0

You played less than 5 hours in multiplayer and that is including competetive/invasion/Firefight and Arena..

And you have two achievements for Halo 3 destroy a vehicle and finish the first mission....

You only played the first mission of Halo 3......and didn't do much in Halo Reach either...how can you even compare them and call it a dissapointment or not...

This is really a big gripe I have with the MS community on Vgchartz...  Hyping up Halo 4/Halo HD: Anniversary like it is best game ever....while most of those people hardly play the other games..

This is really sad.

Pwned.

Just going to give my input, I have 1,400/1,400 on Halo: Reach, over 1,600/1,750 on Halo 3, and 905/1,000 on ODST. Reach was not a disappointment. Although the gameplay was very similar to Halo 3, the overall story direction was much better and very very different. I actually cared about where I went for each mission, which is something I almost never do for a FPS.

Multiplayer is also addictive as hell with amazing Firefight, and commedations. Also Bungie spice things up with new game modes every month.