By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
blkfish92 said:
Dgc1808 said:
blkfish92 said:

Seriously though that reviewer must be retarded, the beta and the demo are amazing, superior to part 1 as a matter as fact. Why, just why did that reviewer give infamous 2 a 7.5?


You can't just the morality system from the demo.
You can't judge the pacing of a game from a demo.
You can't judge just how balanced a 20 hour game's combat will be from a the length offered int he demo.


Well you sure can tell that stuff from the reviews that actually made sence. Judging by all the other reviews the game has gotten it seems that infamous 2 deserves a sturdy 8.5


I haven't really read all the other reviews. If you did and you trust their opinions, that's great. This review however was I found really interesting because it was done by someone that really enjoyed the first game (Like I did) and makes that clear a number of times (like I do) in the review. He obviously was a fan with expectations (much like me) and they just weren't met. I found it interesting that a lot of his complaint were things that I was kinda worried about when the game was announced and we got some initial trailers. First thing I really didn't like was the overdone focus on cinematics and the effects melee had on the camera.



4 ≈ One