Keep Your Sperm Under Lock and Key

[sapphi_snake]

Kasz216 said:

A) Well this first point is just... irrelevent.

B) Right, it wasn't.  What did effect him however was when the kid was born.  Since the Kid is no longer DNA but his biological son.

C)  Where you are mistaken is that one crime does not nessisairly totally rule out other laws.  Nor does it destory the rights of a third party.  IE) The Child.

D)  Sounds like a problem with Romania.  Shit like that happens in anti-female societies like yours.  In a few cases they protect women because women in mother rights because they see them as the only thing they should be doing.

To complain about something that women get because of their descrimination EVERYWHERE ELSE is ridiculiously stupid.  It's like complaining that more black men get introductory jobs and welfare because they aren't aloud to have later laws.

ESPIECALLY in a system like yours that is extremly sexist AND has extremly backwords marriage laws, effectivly removing most women from the workplace via social pressure AND robbing them of any value as a wife and homemaker by robbing them of their due property in a divorce basically making them completely dependent on the husband, no matter how big of a douche they turn into.

Doesn't really happen in the US or Europe.  Except possibly France Italy.  It's shocking the shit that happens in France.

E)  Oh, my mistake.  In that case your sexism is much more understandable.

A. It is relevant, if you're gonna suggest he gave her his sperm and she was allowed to do whatever she wanted with it.

B. The law says that a child's rights begin at conception, provided the child is born alive (at least thats how the law is in my country). The conception also should've been dine with his approaval (unless it happened as a result of a sex act he willingly participated in, which is not the case in either of these 2 examples).

C. The laws are outdated, as I said. A man shouldn't be liable for child support in a situation like this (a woman stealing his sperm, and using it to concieve a child without his consent, which is fraud, as the sperm donor needs to sing a legal document giving his approval). This also doesn't change the fact that both these women should've been jailed for fraud, yet they got a pat on the back in both cases.

D. Your country is the one that has backwards marriage laws, giving huge advantages to women, even though circumstances have greatly changed in your society (most women no longer need their husbands for support). If anything, such laws encourage women to be dependent of men, rather than asser their independence, as it's more comfortable to just stay at home all day, clean the house a little, knowing that you can easily divorce and get half of what your husband worked hard to get, plus monthly alimony 'till you remarry (obviously these laws are very unfair towards men, and overall I would not even consider the ideea of getting married in your country, unless I wanted to play gold digger myself).

Over here women can't do that, plus there's also the fact that one family can't survive on the income of a single person (unless that person is CEO of a big corporation or something). A much larger percentage of women are housewives in the US versus Romania (I've actually only met 2 women in my entire life who didn't work).

Yeah, Romania is sexist, but not that much more than most places.

E. I don't know why you say I'm sexist. I think that women and men should be equals (other than some physiological differences I don't see men and women being different at all, and I'm against the ideea of gender stereotypes). If a had punctured holes in a condom to get her pregnanat, you can be sure he would've been sent to prison, and the woman could've easily aborted and gotten rid of the child (a similar example to the second situation, the one with the oral sex). And if a man had stolen his wife's egg from an egg clinic, he most definately would've been sent to prison (similar example to the first situation). This is certainly not fair.