By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
osamanobama said:
yo_john117 said:
osamanobama said:
yo_john117 said:
Marco said:

5,2 points

good is:

its mario ^^

Yoshi & Luigi playable : )

soundtrack

funny dialogues, but..

- ..very weak story

- graphics is a little bit disappointing

- gameplay is too easy

- level bosses boring

Nintendo once again staged a good Jump'n Run, but it lacks the challenges and hardly any development visible. Part 3 will hopefully be a worthy successor to Part 1

Ok from now on if you rate a game this low I want actual details...way more then you have right now (like 4-5 times as much and that goes for anyone with ultra low scores) So you have a couple hours to edit your post before I rank this thread or your score won't be counted.

what? doesnt that mean you have to go back and adjust scores for other games.

there were tons of low scores for other games with little to no substance

Well this has been the rule for a while, I'm just being a bit stricter now....

only because a bunch of Nintendo fans wanted a higher score, so they complained.

there were a lot of really low KZ scores with little to no reasons. (believe me, do i think KZ deserves a higher score, and i was plenty mad at scores i thought were total BS, but i didnt complain nor did others)

also if this isnt a rule, there should be a rule to force people to have highly detailed high scores as well, or else this contest just becomes a circle jerk.

Yeah but the i've never had an issue with low scores for games lately because the people that posted low scores backed them up with a pretty hefty solid review...Marco on the other hand is half assed and pretty damn short for that score....now I was willing to let it slide but the majority spoke so i'm going to be much stricter from now on.