By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 on 02 June 2011
Edit Thread
sapphi_snake said:
Kasz216 said:

A. It's not silly.  It's called common sense, since in life people have to give up things to support a marriage.  For example, she has to give up chances at other dudes sperm.

B.  It doesn't matter.  If I say "I give this PS3 to you to watch movies."  and you use it to play games... I can't do shit about it.

As for extending the analogy... the part where it fails is... you are now treating a child as property.

A child is a person.  Sperm is not.

The sex act he had eventually ended up in him having a child.  So he is obviously responsible and should of paid more attention.

A. I think what you consider to be "common sense" is just nonsense. Glad laws are different over here in this aspect. All assets are separate (except those who were acquired together, as in with money provided by both spouses). Obviously a man's sperm is his own property. Women will be entitled to sperm when they'll be able to produce it themselves.

B. Not really. If you specified that, you can say I broke the conditions of our agreement, and ask to recieve the PS3 back.

The sex act did not result in him having a child. The conception of the child was the result of the woman putting the sperm in her vagina by herself (using IFV or whatever, I don't remember what it said in the article). IT WAS NOT THE RESULT OF THE ORAL SEX (actually the act that resulted in the conception of the child was not sexual at all, and it did not involve the man at all). If the man had intended for his sperm to wind up in the woman's vagina, he would've inserted his penis in her vagina, and would've ejaculated in her. He did not do that. Also, I'm sure that the woman decieved him, and faked disposing of the sperm (either by pretening to swallow it, or something similar).

Anyways, if this woman wanted the child, she should take care of it HERSELF. These women are too self-entitled, thinking that thay have a right to use a man's sperm without his permission, and then make the men financially support their whims.


A) That's completely nonsensicle.  Considering that a large percentage of marriages end in divorce... such laws basically mandate that both parents need to work or one of them ends up fucked on the highly likely chance they get a divorce.

Which is very damaging to children.

B)  The sex act did cause it to happen... because that is when he released the sperm to her.

And no... I could not take back the PS3.  Unless you signed a written document specifically waiving that right of using the PS3.  Actually, even that I don't think would be legal based on the EU framework of the laws.