Keep Your Sperm Under Lock and Key

[Kasz216]

sapphi_snake said:

Kasz216 said:

A)  Er no.  They did have joint custody of the sperm... there is such a thing as joint custody when married all property is joint custody.   The sperm was frozen in a sperm bank... while they were married.

Which means it belonged to both of them.  Once it comes out of you it's a possesion just like anything else.

Look at blood.

B) He gave her his sperm.  After giving it to her... he has no say in how she uses it.

If I gave you a PS3 because you talked about how you wanted a movie player, do i have any right to sue you after I see you playing a PS3 game?  Afterall, i never gave you permission to play a PS3 game.

A. Sorry, I forgot about the silly laws you Americans had. Over here "joint property" is only what both spouses contribute to, and obviously a woman has no contribution in the production of sperm. It's no wonder you guys need prenups.

B. Did he specifically say "I give this sperm to you, do with it as you please"? Also, if that's the case, then it's her business what she did with it. He's not responsable for what she does with the sperm.

If I give you a PS3, and you want to get an extra controller for it, would you have any right to sue me to pay for that extra controller? I mean, I gave you the PS3 to do what you wanted with it. It's no longer my business. You can't have it both ways.

A. It's not silly.  It's called common sense, since in life people have to give up things to support a marriage.  For example, she has to give up chances at other dudes sperm.

B.  It doesn't matter.  If I say "I give this PS3 to you to watch movies."  and you use it to play games... I can't do shit about it.

As for extending the analogy... the part where it fails is... you are now treating a child as property.

A child is a person.  Sperm is not.

The sex act he had eventually ended up in him having a child.  So he is obviously responsible and should of paid more attention.