Keep Your Sperm Under Lock and Key

[sapphi_snake]

Kasz216 said:

sapphi_snake said:

Kasz216 said:

No... ruling for the child isn't the same thing as ruling for the woman... because you know.  If he wins custody, she now has to pay him.

In general if the man gets custody she now has to pay him.  The only reason it doesn't work both ways is because currently men can't give birth and they don't have "test tube" babies yet.

And from the sound of it... he wouldn't mind the children.

 

He won't win custody, unless he presses charges against her and has her arrested. I hope that the courts would deem him the better parent in that case.

However in most cases the man won't get custody (like for example the case of the second link I gave).

It's also quite irrelevant that the man can get custody, and then recieve alimony, in these types situations I mean. This man may not midn the kids (though they have caused and will cause a huge financial strain on him), but many men may mind the kids existence, and the fact that they have to support the brats.

In the second case the judge was correct.

The man gave her the sperm.

That she used it is his own fault for not making sure it was properly disposed of.

The only reason the first case was wrong is because they were supposed to have joint custody of the sperm and she forged his signature.

In the second case he didn't give her the sperm. He was just letting her hold it.

In the first case I don't think they had "joint custody" of the sperm. There's no such thing. It was his sperm, and she stole it.In both cases the women used men's sperm without their permition in order to get pregnant. They should not be liable to pay alimony.