| Kasz216 said: No... ruling for the child isn't the same thing as ruling for the woman... because you know. If he wins custody, she now has to pay him. In general if the man gets custody she now has to pay him. The only reason it doesn't work both ways is because currently men can't give birth and they don't have "test tube" babies yet. And from the sound of it... he wouldn't mind the children.
|
He won't win custody, unless he presses charges against her and has her arrested. I hope that the courts would deem him the better parent in that case.
However in most cases the man won't get custody (like for example the case of the second link I gave).
It's also quite irrelevant that the man can get custody, and then recieve alimony, in these types situations I mean. This man may not midn the kids (though they have caused and will cause a huge financial strain on him), but many men may mind the kids existence, and the fact that they have to support the brats.
"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"
"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."
(The Voice of a Generation and Seece)
"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"
(pizzahut451)
