Keep Your Sperm Under Lock and Key

[Kasz216]

sapphi_snake said:

Kasz216 said:

Oh?  Prove it... and prove it's a common phenomna.

Also, i think your ignoring that in the cases it does happen.  They aren't ruling for the women.

They are ruling for the child.

A smart move for people caught in rulings like this who lose appeals would be to demand custody rights because their other parent literally went behind their back to have a kid.

In this case it's not the man's fault that the child exists, so he should not be liable to pay alimony. The woman stole the sperm to concieve the child, she should have to care for it. The persons who participates in the creation of the child are suppose to care for it, which excludes the man in this case. And rulgin for the child is the same thing as ruling for the woman, as she's the one who recieves the money.

Also, why would he sue for custody? That would only work if you genuenly want the child.

No... ruling for the child isn't the same thing as ruling for the woman... because you know.  If he wins custody, she now has to pay him.

In general if the man gets custody she now has to pay him.  The only reason it doesn't work both ways is because currently men can't give birth and they don't have "test tube" babies yet.

And from the sound of it... he wouldn't mind the children.