| Kasz216 said:
Also, i think your ignoring that in the cases it does happen. They aren't ruling for the women. They are ruling for the child. A smart move for people caught in rulings like this who lose appeals would be to demand custody rights because their other parent literally went behind their back to have a kid. |
In this case it's not the man's fault that the child exists, so he should not be liable to pay alimony. The woman stole the sperm to concieve the child, she should have to care for it. The persons who participates in the creation of the child are suppose to care for it, which excludes the man in this case. And rulgin for the child is the same thing as ruling for the woman, as she's the one who recieves the money.
Also, why would he sue for custody? That would only work if you genuenly want the child.
"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"
"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."
(The Voice of a Generation and Seece)
"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"
(pizzahut451)
