badgenome on 30 May 2011
| KungKras said: It's "could have" not "could of" argh, I hate that typo. "Have" doesn't even look remotely like "of". And most people doing it are native speakers. It drives me insane! |
It's not a typo. Many people legitimately confuse "have" and "of", presumably because of the way that contractions like "should've" sound kind of like "should of". These people sicken me.
