By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pokeclaudel on 29 May 2011
Edit Thread
Mr Khan said:
pokeclaudel said:

 

I waited four years and you know what Nintendo gave us The legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past.  A freaking side story about some kid thousands of year in the future. I wanted to see Link mature into a man. I gave it a shot and I admit it's a good game so I let it slide and patiently waited for the real Zelda III.

I thought LttP was, well, in the Past. My general understanding of the child timeline was OoT -> MM -> TP -> LttP -> Oracles -> FSA -> Zelda -> Zelda II -> Awakening

no it goes adult MC -> FSA -> Oot -> TP -> WW -> PH -> SP -> Oracles
then child  MC -> FSA -> Oot -> MM -> Zelda -> Zelda II -> Awakening -> Lttp

It's Nintendo's fault why we still haven't got a proper Kingdom Hearts 3 from SquareEnix. SE is following Nintendo's foot steps. They're probably thinking all we need to do is keep making these side stories with no real bearing on the actual story line and we'll be rich because these gamers will keep eating them up.

And now ubisoft is making a 4th Assassin's Creed game yet not actually make ACIII! Even though Brotherhood was an amazing game with a fun multiplayer aspect I'm not going to even bother with Revelations. These companies need to stop milking these franchises with dumb sidestories that try to expand the backstory or the universe they live in and just continue the story of the main line.