Kasz216 said:
Rath said:
Kasz216 said:
Rath said:
The thing is some kind of military force is essentially required for a sovereign state. Israels conditions basically would give Palestine faux-sovereignity but leave Israel still holding de facto control. It'd basically be the status quo with a different veneer.
|
Tell that to Lichtenstein, Costa Rica, Microneisa, Grenada, Iceland...
|
Well Costa Rica, Grenada and Iceland all have paramilitary forces of some kind, even without a proper military. Lichtenstien as a microstate is a bit different.
Micronesia is a good example though, with their security carried out by the USA. However there is a different in having your security carried out by a ally in a mutually beneficial arrangement and having your security carried out by a historic enemy by their demands. The second one is essentially occupation.
|
And Palestine has a paramilitary force as it is right now. Being demilitarized doesn't mean you can't have a particularly strong police force. It just suggests you probably shouldn't have big missles, when your basic MO has been to fire small ones at will into your neighbors territory.
|
Israel however wants to have troops in any newly formed Palestine...