By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Rath said:
Kasz216 said:
Rath said:

The thing is some kind of military force is essentially required for a sovereign state. Israels conditions basically would give Palestine faux-sovereignity but leave Israel still holding de facto control. It'd basically be the status quo with a different veneer.


Tell that to Lichtenstein, Costa Rica, Microneisa, Grenada, Iceland...


Well Costa Rica, Grenada and Iceland all have paramilitary forces of some kind, even without a proper military. Lichtenstien as a microstate is a bit different.

Micronesia is a good example though, with their security carried out by the USA. However there is a different in having your security carried out by a ally in a mutually beneficial arrangement and having your security carried out by a historic enemy by their demands. The second one is essentially occupation.

And Palestine has a paramilitary force as it is right now.  Being demilitarized doesn't mean you can't have a particularly strong police force.  It just suggests you probably shouldn't have big missles, when your basic MO has been to fire small ones at will into your neighbors territory.