Khuutra said:
vlad321 said:
LordMatrix said:
vlad321 said:
These types of games? These types of games are always better on a keyboard solely because of the amount of keys that you ave available to you. The controllers have but a fractoin of them. Now as to why there was the entire stupid system where you can use only 1 sign/pocket item instead of quickly switching between them liek the swords, I don't know. It was stupid however.
|
Forgot to say IMO. Third Person Action RPG games for most people, are best played on a console.
|
Not, not IMO. Objectively it is better because you can objectively count how many keys are on your controller and how many keys are on your keyboard, and objectively that gives you more functionality. I am piss tired of people trying to pass off quantitative facts as opinoins to make themselves feel better. It's like saying that It is subjective that the mouse is better than dual analog sticks for shooters of all kinds.
|
No sir. You are wrong. There is no functionality that a keyboard offers in Witcher 2 that isn't perfectly mimicked by a 360 controller. Every single meaningful action can be mapped to one of the controller's buttons.
And FYI: don't go spouting off about what you can or can't do unless you read the manual (also read the manual, though that usually requires you to actually legally obtain yoru games, I'm sure). Switching to the next sign is done with 3, the next quick-use item is done with 4.
I don't even have the game installed; I know this stuff because I looked in the manual.
|
My friend played the Witcher 2 with a controller pad. There should be no argument about its capacity to be on consoles. The only thing they would probably do is drop the graphics level (which shouldnt matter to those who want the gameplay).
