By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dsage01 on 26 May 2011
Edit Thread
Chrizum said:
dsage01 said:
Chrizum said:

Definitely. Sometimes it looks like a PS3 game and sometimes it looks like a PS2 game. That's unacceptable for a game of this stature. The gap between the visually good and visually bad is so huge, it can at times totally pull me out of the game.

Uncharted 2? Beautiful. God of War 3? Amazing. GT5? Probably the least impressive graphics I have seen on PS3.

This is the perfect example. People compare GT5 visuals with Uncharted 2 and God of War 3 visuals. That's like comparing GT5 sales with God of War or Uncharted sales. GT out sold them both in 4 weeks despite they being one of the strongest exclusive sellers for the PS3. GT5 has great visuals and easily one of the best looking PS3 games. If people say Reach has good visuals why doesn't GT5? It's not the best, it's defintley not the worst but it's still great

The GT series is much more about graphics than for example the GoW series. At times GT5 really sucks me out of the game instead of into the game because some things look even below PS2 level. That is unacceptable. I'm not comparing its graphics directly with Uncharted and God of War. But those games achieve their goal, and when it comes to graphics, GT5 doesn't. Still a really well made game though, but not as good as previous GT games or probably even Forza.


Lower than PS2 level. That is plain BS right there! I understand that at launch they did screw some things up but now it''s all okay with the updates. GT5 is a milestone better than GT4. How can you say that it's below PS2 level. Infact it's much higher than the normal PS3 level. Look at games like Warhawk, Uncharted 1, Resistance games, Rachet games, e.t.c. I think you should take back the statement I bolded back. Because that is just ridiculas. If games like GT5 are below PS2 level in some aspects what about Halo, Forza or Gears? They're probably at PS1 level then right?