Ha! Anonymous didnt do it. It was Phantom.

[vlad321]

o_O.Q said:

vlad321 said:

o_O.Q said:

vlad321 said:

I never said you said all modifications are not allowed, I just said you are treating modification of the PS3 as a privilage, like PSN access, that can be restricted.

You try to justify forbidding modifications of your own privately owned property because of the fact that it may adversely affect a public service. If that is not the point you are making, then why the hell are you bringing up that people's modding may inconvenience people on the PS?

some modifications have to be restricted yes in the context of allowing the user of the modified console to interact with the network but i never said all

The opposite of no restrictoins, or a right, is that there exist some restrictions, thus it beocmes a privilage controlled by sony like PSN.

As I already said before, denynig people the right to modify their property as they see fit is a laughable stance.

you cannot modify something as you see fit and still interact with other people and their possessions ( in certain conditions ) thats what this is about not stopping modifications but determining which modifications cause harm to others and restricting them

just like the car for example yes i can strap a sword to my car but it must remain within my personal space i can't expect to go out and drive on the road therefore a restriction is imposed

A restriction is imposed on PSN, not on the hacking of the PS3. I can put any amount of swords I want in my car and not give a damn about anything. You have it all sorts of wrong.