| ZaneWane said: Nowhere near best looking let alone good looking http://static.gamesradar.com/images/mb/GamesRadar/us/Daily/2010/11-Nov/25/Gran Turismo 5 super review/Shadows--article_image.jpg http://static.gamesradar.com/images/mb/GamesRadar/us/Daily/2010/11-Nov/25/Gran Turismo 5 super review/Tree--article_image.jpg http://static.gamesradar.com/images/mb/GamesRadar/us/Daily/2010/11-Nov/25/Gran Turismo 5 super review/Paste--article_image.jpg http://static.gamesradar.com/images/mb/GamesRadar/us/Daily/2010/11-Nov/25/Gran Turismo 5 super review/Berlinette--article_image.jpg http://static.gamesradar.com/images/mb/GamesRadar/us/Daily/2010/11-Nov/25/Gran Turismo 5 super review/Smoke--article_image.jpg http://static.gamesradar.com/images/mb/GamesRadar/us/Daily/2010/11-Nov/25/Gran Turismo 5 super review/Crowds2--article_image.jpg |
And I remember reading someone who said the above was SO horrible (the trees, shadows, etc...) it made them having a hard time playing Gran Turismo 5. I guess GT5 is supposed to look SO awesome, and amazing and epic, it forces the entire planet to bow down and worship the PS3 as some monster powerhouse of a console, they have no choice but to buy it, and burn every other console in the process, then go on forums and defend the awesomeness of the PS3 (yes, the Playstation brand is supposed to be a religion I guess). Short of this, you rip it to shreads, because it failed to meet expectation.
I still say, even with all the images above being true, why should it matter? Cut and paste BUSHES in the background a big deal? Why? How about asking if GT5 is worth owning if you have a PS3, and are looking for a driving sim on that console? I would say yes. But maybe cut and paste bushes in the background really prevent people from wanting to own it.
Back in the day, we played this... and we liked it!
