phinch1 said:
Kasz216 said:
phinch1 said:
Kasz216 said:
Except you know... they didn't.
|
Well that's down to personal opinion, i do believe this is a case where Sony gave an inch and a small minortiy of people tried to take a mile
|
I can't see what drives such an opinion though... espiecally considering case law against this.
NIntendo lost everytime they tried to sue people who made games like Action 52.
|
Why are you bringing up nintendo? The only reason i pulled up your comment was because you said
"ony just goes very far out of their way to try and prevent you from being able to program on their console."
Which is a completely unfair comment as they have even pushed it in some cases, yet we both have personal opinions on it, i think its wrong what hackers have been trying to get out of the system and have taken it too far, and you don't, were not going to agree so lets just leave it...
|
In very rare cases... and then they sued someone who made their robot dog do tricks and increase the sales of the product... Sony pretty much goes one way on this.
Aside from which... we have different opinions... but the thing is... I'm basing mine on something. I don't see anything your basing your opinion on... except wanting to have an opinion that is what it is. It would be like argueing about evoltion. One person has something they can point to as a precedent (like I just did with A52) while another group has none.
