| ZaneWane said: Nowhere near best looking let alone good looking http://static.gamesradar.com/images/mb/GamesRadar/us/Daily/2010/11-Nov/25/Gran Turismo 5 super review/Shadows--article_image.jpg http://static.gamesradar.com/images/mb/GamesRadar/us/Daily/2010/11-Nov/25/Gran Turismo 5 super review/Tree--article_image.jpg http://static.gamesradar.com/images/mb/GamesRadar/us/Daily/2010/11-Nov/25/Gran Turismo 5 super review/Paste--article_image.jpg http://static.gamesradar.com/images/mb/GamesRadar/us/Daily/2010/11-Nov/25/Gran Turismo 5 super review/Berlinette--article_image.jpg http://static.gamesradar.com/images/mb/GamesRadar/us/Daily/2010/11-Nov/25/Gran Turismo 5 super review/Smoke--article_image.jpg http://static.gamesradar.com/images/mb/GamesRadar/us/Daily/2010/11-Nov/25/Gran Turismo 5 super review/Crowds2--article_image.jpg |
coming from a person who created an account solely for the purpose of claiming Crysis 2 has the best graphics?
on topic: ironically Gt5 is kind of like Crysis in a way. at times it has drop dead gorgeous graphics. Gt5 can just look Photorealistic at times, the premium cars far surpase everything, but like Crysis 2, it has lots of inconsitancies, and though to not the same extent as Crysis, it has some performance issues (though that has a lot to do with it running in native 1080p, 60fps target, and rendering 16 cars on screen. if Gt5 would have went with a 720p (or even slightly lower like crysis) native resolution, and 8 cars instead of 16, it would look a lot more uniform, yes the cars would look nearly as good, but other stuff would have looked better.
but in all its a great looking game, and its very impressive that it it the only game that can pull off native 1080p, 16 cars, and ~60 FPS
