Kenryoku_Maxis said:
First of all, nearly all the 'least powerful' systems in the past came out ahead in third party support. SNES was weaker than the Neo Geo, PSX was weaker than the N64, PS2 was weaker than the GC and XBOX. The difference is, Third parties didn't actively support the Wii from the beginning like they did those other systems. Its third parties that MADE those systems. If they wanted to ,they could have done the same for the Wii, but actively chose not to, while complaining Nitnendo was taking over the industry. That's just crying about someone else succeeding when you didn't put forth the effort (like on the SNES, PSX and PS2). Second of all, Wii didn't have the so called 'good' games for years. All it had WAS knock-off casual games and really low budget titles like Zack and Wiki, Soul Calibur Legends and Dragon Quest Swords. These are in no way strong third party support. If this had been their level of 'third party' support o nthe PS3 and 360, you'd see people crying about lack of support. People joke that PS3 had no games in its first 2 years. It got a TON better content than the Wii. |
hey hey hey now ... zack and wiki was a great game.
besides ... can you really tell me with an honest face that wii sports, wii fit, wii fit plus, wii play, wii play motion, wii music, mario sports mix, brain age wii degree, endless ocean, excite truck, wii party, mario party 8 were high budget games?