PullusPardus said:
osamanobama said:
SeriousWB said:
The bald guy is full of strawmen and red herrings it's hilarious. He doesn't respond to points or questions, he just spouts some 'catchphrase' with a random hyperbole number with an emotional/relatable hook that idiots will fall for. Call of Duty and SMB1 aren't the type of thing that would get funding. Dumbest thing I've viewed today.
|
exactly, why dont these games not get finding while others do.
also sense the video hasnt worked for me, how do you know what types of games will get funding?
edit: video finally works. any game that is deemed art will get funding. so if call of duty is considered art it will get funding, and whos to say games like that arent art while others are. no art should get funded by federal government
|
you missed the guy's point badly.
(SeriousWB i mean)
|
know i understood what he was saying, but i was turning what he was trying to prove as a good thing, as a bad thing.
im saying just because funding is suppossed to go to "art-full indie" games doesnt mean its good