RolStoppable said:
I am not so sure about this, mandatory installs on the PS3 are often used to bring the loading times more in line with the 360 versions of games, because the PS3's Blu-ray drive is pretty slow. It doesn't necessarily mean that the PS3 version loads faster, so posting the actual time it takes each version on average to load would be much appreciated.
Uh, what? Look it up, in almost any multiplat game PS3 version slightly or greatly faster loading times (DC4, GTA IV, Bioshock, RDR...)
What Microsoft did last gen was hardly butt kicking. Losing $4 billion to outsell the profitable Gamecube by a mere three million units rather suggests big selfownage, especially because that "huge" triumph of beating Nintendo didn't actually help Microsoft to have an advantage over them this generation.
They still sold more. A new comer with little to no new IPs and almost no 1st party support defeated the company who has been in industry for over 20 years, with by far most experience and with the most iconic IPs in video game world.
Make a thread that in any way puts Sony in a negative light and see how many Sony folks appear. It's certainly going to be a longer thread than pretty much anything else on VGC. Sony fans make up for the majority of active members around here, there's no way around it. Besides, the point I made wasn't concerning the amount of Sony vs. Nintendo fans, but Sony vs. Microsoft fans. There are more Sony than Microsoft fans here (which you agree on), hence why I get more often into discussions with the Sony folks.
Actually, the case is exact opposite. Make any Sony negative thread and see how many anti Sony rants you'll find there. if there is one thing Nintendo and Microsoft folks get more excited about than MS/Nintendo negative thread ITS A SONY NEGATVIE THREAD. The latest and best example is PSN outage.
|
