By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mr Khan said:
Killiana1a said:

The worst thing we (the USA, Europe, Japan, and the emerging markets) want is for this "Arab Spring" to blossom into a war where Israel is attacked by Egypt and Lebanon with the Palestinians doing their thing hoping a stray bottle rocket or two catches an Israeli settler's roof on fire.

Noone wants to pick sides because it sets us apart in a fashion that does not allow the newest fashion to be made in China and sold in a Banana Republic near you.

What we want is a Palestinian state. If that means piling sand in the Mediterranean to give them the land needed to accomodate their 15 child families with 10 sons who grow to be suicide bomber, then so be it. Lets all unite our bulldozers and start piling the sand in the Mediterranean ala Minecraft style so these people have a space to live and grow.

The alternative are B-52 bombers, napalm and "collateral damage." In more honest times, we would call this genocide and turn the other cheek. Nowadays, we all faux outrage over the slightest booboo a Palestinian receives. We all collectively kiss it because not to do so would not make us cool or "politically correct" as the cool kids term it.

That sword of political correctness cuts both ways. Nobody can come out as anti-Israel or the Israeli lobby flies off the handle with the anti-Semite card (waiting for it to happen here. American Jews themselves trend Liberal, unlike their brethren pretty much everywhere else, but the Israeli lobby is quite vocal). People like Jimmy Carter who draw comparisons between Israel and South Africa get booed down

It's a simple, straightforward procedure. Move the legal settlers to another spot so that the West Bank isn't criscrossed with "access highways" that serve to keep them penned in like cattle, treat the illegal settlers the same as you treat Hamas, and make Jerusalem a free International City. I believe the majority on both sides would be happy with it, aside from the more hawkish wing of Likud and the more strictly destructive wing of Hamas

You'd be wrong.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3866367,00.html

However most of those asked by the survey supported the view that construction in east Jerusalem should be treated like construction in Tel Aviv, despite the harsh criticism launched at the government over the recent diplomatic dispute with the US.

 

Also worth noting is Eastern Jerusalems Palestines opinions on the matter...

http://www.pechterpolls.com/

 

More would rather be Israeli then Palestinian.  If the arguement is that Palestine should be it's own country because the Palestinians want it to be... shouldn't it also be true that the Palestinians of East Jerusalem should be allowed to be part of Israel if both they and the Israeli's want it to be so?

Why should those who want Palestine to exist but don't want to be a part of it, be forced to be in this case?  Because everyone else not in that area want it to be so?