By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Vetteman94 on 17 May 2011
Edit Thread
Silver-Tiger said:
Wonktonodi said:
 

If people are voting based on how he's playing day one will him admitting reading his first post satisfy them or is it too late and they are out for blood?

That's what I have been fearing. People aren't voting for linkz because they think he's scum, but because they don't like his playstyle.

Again, I asking everyone to refrain from voting Linkz because of the whole Pm fiasco. I do not suspect him at all.

In the meantime I analyzed Zarx. well, he seems legit. he doesn't post often, but when he comments, it's reasonable and make sense. Additionally, he didn't jump on the bandwagon when he had all chance to do it.

theprof00 said:

lol, early paranoia

I guess you're town.

My point is...what kind of question is "are you townie". Like, What? Shouldn't you be asking "are you scum". And even so, what's with the directness? You think I'd just crumble? Or, if I lied, what then?

Your post comes off as extremely lazy, and more realistically, more aloof. It is for that reason alone that I've decided that you're town..well, at least for now.

But yes, I do win if town wins. If that means I am town, then yes, I am town.

I was surprised nobody questioned this. This implies that he isn't actually townie, but has something liek a third-party role which wins if town wins. I would love to get some information on that.

I think that just theprof being vague,  all my PMs when I have pro-town roles says that I win when the town wins, its probably him reciting his PM and adding a little extra too it to cause a stir. I cant think of a third party that would fall into that situation, third party kinda implies that he has his own win scenario like a cult or a SK.