Kenryoku_Maxis said:
I will admit a lot of my comments were genralizations. But can you blame me, when people are not just stopping at saying Samus was ruined, but trying to defend their opinion by saying every part of Other M sucked. And not even letting up for anything. Even when they are forced to see that Other M used the same enemies, bosses and locations as Super Metroid, a lot of these haters make up excuses to why the ENTIRE gameplay and design sucked. Its like the opposite of Prime, where people claim the games were perfect in every way. The most pure example of extreme love or hate reactions to things. And like I keep saying, the majority of them made the exact same arguments against Metroid Fusion even up to a year ago. Its only been since the release of Other M that people stopped focusing on how Fusion 'ruined' the series and instead focus on Other M. What's next? Are they going to jump on the next Metroid and claim Other M was 'an alright game'? Also, what makes me think they are the same people is because more than a few of them have admited it. |
Okay, well I'm not part of that group, and if they have been stating that, those are just whiners. I'm more of that the game wasn't appealing and failed to grow the series in the direction it took.
Plus trying to emulate those story games shows that the people working on that failed to see why those cames caught on.
But no, it didn't ruin the series. If Nintendo allows this direction to continue, it might, but not this game alone.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs








