Mr Puggsly said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Mr Puggsly said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Mr Puggsly said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
What have they poured into Kinect?.......A little over a Billion perhaps? Lets hope it is worth it at E3. I also hope to see first party titles....not third party. We already know Microsoft can pay people to do work Microsoft studios and lionhead cant.
|
As far as we know Kinect probably earned a billion dollars. I mean it boosted 360 console sales by millions YoY and Kinect has sold about 10 million units as well. On top of that its boosted software sales and likely accessories as well.
Lets hope it was worth it? It clearly already has been.
Kinect games that Microsoft is publishing are Project Draco, Haunt, Codename D, and Gunstringer. At least some of them should be talked about at E3.
|
Thats good. Casual games= money saved for Microsoft. Maybe that money saved can go to core titles. :)
|
Exclusive core games are always in the works. I guess just not enough for you.
I have enough trouble completing all the games I own. Whether they be multiplat or exclusive.
|
Whats not enough is what does not exist. As I've said they'll probably get some third party to do it for them and risk quality, because I don't think Microsoft does quality assurance checks third parties outside of Epic games.
|
You're getting into something else now. I could argue Sony, Nintendo, Capcom, Activions, EA, Sega, and some other big companies don't always have great quality control either.
Sony for example. Some relatively recent titles like Motorstorm: Apocalypse, Socom 4, PS Move Heroes, DC Universe Online, The Fight, The Shoot, Start the Party, and Kung Fu Rider don't exactly scream great quality control. That's 8 games Sony should have kept their eye on.
|
To argue an in-house first party quality control battle would be a horrible argument to try and win. Even worse for a third party when it comes to Microsoft. Nintendo isn't even in this topic because they and third parties don't even mix.
