Phoeniks.Wright said:
Sure, I didn't play it, but looking at the videos, and you can find ones where the guy just plays, no commentary, I saw 3 things which just shouldn't be here: an over-reliance on missiles, it's almost as if it was the standard beam it's used that much; the cutscenes with the characterisation of Samus. The quicker they get rid of this and forget about it, the better. And finally, you're exploring a metallic hub ship or whatnot. It is boring, very boring. In metroiod and the prime games, I'm actually exploring a planet, which offers such diverse locations, I was in awe when I played them, especially prime 1. Here, it's just "meh, some slightly different metal pieces". I also don't think the entire series is crap, just that this game is horrible, and it looks that it's not going to get much better from this. |
You rely on Missiles a LOT more in games like Metroid II, Fusion and Prime than in Other M. You can actually beat nearly every boss just with charge beam, aside from probably the Queen Metroid (which takes a Super Bomb) and MB, which does focus on missiles.
Heck, you can even defeat Nightmare and Phantoon with just Charge Beams. It'll take longer, but you can.
And while I've said dozens of times that Other M could have been more open ended and allow for more exploration, its not as bad as you guys make it out to be. Each area is very distinct and each Sector mimics the same areas as in Super Metroid. The only 'Metalic' focused areas are Main Sector and Sector 0. Hell, I could even argue there's more 'metalic' style areas in Prime and Fusion than in Other M.
I still contend that you can't call a game crap without having played it.











