By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Soleron said:
Ajescent said:

In any case I think Anon needs to back off now, they made their point and another attack will cloud any innocence that they might have held on to.

Anon doesn't exist. There's nothing to blame.

The specific individuals who are prominent in organising IRC channels under the Anon name and so on are denying this, which I believe because they would publicise anything they did, that's the point.

All this will lead to is those individuals being investigated for no reason.

An Anon was involved in the attacks and claims to be part of Anonymous and due to Anonymous strucure that makes them part of Anonymous which is why any claims that "It wasn't Anonymous, it was Anonymous because Anonymous left proof  they were involved while Anonymous claimed no responsiblity for Anonymous" is just stupid....