radiantshadow92 said:
*spoileralert* There was no reason for him to die. He made a deal with the feds to be left alone if he killed his old gang. That was the deal. If the feds wnated him dead, they could have killed him any moment after he finally killed the last gang member (in the mountians). Not wait a few days and then get him, that makes no sense. It just makes no sence for why they would want him dead exactly at that moment. The made a deal, and even if they still wanted him dead they could have done it days earlier. Not wait like a week and then randomly do it. It was dumb and makes no sence. |
here is the thread on how to mark spoilers. if you want to.
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=117278
OT: red dead redemption is much better than gta4 in my opinion. gta4 was to realistic with character I couldn't relate too. were as red dead it was a man trying to save his family, which I could emphazise with and although realistic it was set in a different era, which was interesting to me. there was many more reason I liked rdr and many more reason I disliked gta 4. of course I wouldn't say gta 4 was bad though I still enjoyed it enough to play it through twice.
correct me if I am wrong
stop me if I am bias
I love a good civilised debate (but only if we can learn something).







