By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
puffy said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Mr Khan said:

Again all the judging about Mario 3DS when we know shit-all about it.


This is why he occasionally states a lot of his analysis is deduction based on things he does know. If the game turns out to be something with more mass appeal (since the facts are that the 3D games are not killer apps), then he will gladly admit his analysis before was wrong.

As for whoever brought up that Nintendo will be the first to stream to a controller, not only is that also speculation, that doesn't mean it will attract the mainstream to the system. They want good games, not mediocre games that have gimmicks and/or just please reviewers (and before you bring up sales and reviews on other systems, correlation=/=causation, and a lot of those games don't have legs).

I was speaking specifically about disruption, you know, the thing Malstrom was actually right about from the beginning?


A new gimmick is not disruption. Just introducing something new is not disruption. Doing what the other guys should have been doing is disruption.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs