theprof00 said:
vlad321 said:
theprof00 said:
vlad321 said:
I woud dlove for you to restate what your new questions were, because I don't see any unanswered questions. Just your evasions.
Edit: Let me outline just how stupid you are sounding. Ail states that they don't gloat because they may end up going to jail if caught, if they decide to gloat. Yet a text file WHICH CAN BE CREATED BY ANYONE, stating "Anon was here" was left behind. So they completely defeat the purpose of not saying who it is that did it, without getting any of the benefit of ridiculing the company. That is where you are headed with this? This is on top of the fact that Anonymous has ridiculed every company they have hacked before? It doesn't take more than 3 brain cells to add 2 and 2 together here.
|
You are saying I sound stupid and putting Ail's words in MY mouth? Are you fucking trolling me?
AND "So they completely defeat the purpose of not saying who it is that did it, without getting any of the benefit of ridiculing the company."
WHAT? HOW? WHO?
say who did it: check
ridicule company: check
wow dude, 10/10 troll. I'm baffled. Seriously baffled.
|
I am not putting his words in your mouth, you replied to my reply to him so I assumed that you were backing his point. Why talk otherwise?
How did you get the check for "ridicule company?" Do you know what ridicule means to Anon? Here let me educate you:
http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/2294/internetsanon.jpg
That is ridiculing, on top of just the hack.
|
Um, that anon brought down PSN for 2 weeks plus?
But again, even though you yourself understand that one hacker isn't another, you treat them all like they're the same person or use the same protocols.
|
Anonymous comes with a culture, one that seems to have been fairly consistent with their hacking. I have evidence of their previous hacks backing me up. Where is your evidence that they don't publicly ridicule whoever it is they hacked?
