And we are back to Square 1 as Sony implicates Anonymous to US House Probe

[vlad321]

theprof00 said:

vlad321 said:

1. You are telling me that businesses don't try to get blame off themselves whenever they can no matter what?

2. Let me spell it out for you then. Random group of people gets together. They want to achieve 1 specific goal. Any time a situation like this happens, where there is one common specific goal, a "leader" will emerge, in this case it's probably Random Guy #732 who knows what he is talking about when it comes to the given situation. Next time it could be Random Guy #17. When they are done said leaders, or Random Guy #673 who knows how to make a statement without getting caught, goes out and gloats about how some company got screwed or not.

1. Not gunna keep arguing this. I understand that you are presenting a possibility, but you have to be aware that is quite the longshot.

2. Again, you're bringing a leader into this. You're once again creating a group context for a lone gunman.

1. You don't seem to realize that a simple text file is just a laughable amount of evidence, one which can be faked without a trace easily.

2. Except that you don't seem to understand that your "lone gunman" would be Random Guy #59, and in the end if a given end was the goal of the current set of people who associate with Anonymous at the time, they would be gloating about it. Anonymous is the label given to the group of people behind the current effort, and if a result is reachd, the group will gloat about it. The Anonymous that hacked into Gawker, is probably not the same one that hacked HBGary. If they gloat in the next few weeks, I wouldn't be surprised, however since they haven't gloated yet, it is just plain stupid to think it's them.

Also, not close to everyone chased by homeland security gets sent to Guantanamo. Sorry to break it to you but that's how it is. Now either provide me anything that gives me evidence that supports your claim, or you can jsut stop talking out of your ass.