And we are back to Square 1 as Sony implicates Anonymous to US House Probe

[vlad321]

theprof00 said:

vlad321 said:

theprof00 said:

vlad321 said:

1.First of all, I love how one text file is used as evidence. I mean really. In fact, to show you what I mean, I just created a text file named Anonymous that had "We Are Legion" in it on my desktop.

Second, Anonymous isn't a group that has entrance exams interviews or anything. You can come and you can go as much as you want. I can be part of anonymous just by saying so, and if I feel liek it I can say I am not a part of them. You (and I mean you, the individual reading this) can do the exact same. 

So there you go, two reasons just how silly this is.

2. Edit: I forgot to mention. Do you HONESTLY think Anonymous will go ahead an literally rape a humongous company's security that they hate, and then proceed to not gloat endlessly about it? If you say yes, then you don't know anything about Anonymous' previous actions.

1. Yes, but is your text file on a Sony mainframe?

2. It's only been discovered this morning, and I've seen literally a dozen threads on 4chan saying "WE ARE LEGION".

If I was logged onto a Sony mainframe, yes it would be.

So wait, are you implying that Anonymous wouldn't gloat until the victims found out it was them? If not, then there is no point to yoru argument.

1. Then that's a "no"

2. My point is nothing. You're correct. I just felt that you had no point either.

You just made this huge speech about how anyone can come and go and do whatever and be in anon, and then a second later not be in anon.......and then you say Anon (the representative body/ capitalized for distinction between the representative body and the memberless, casually-affiliated concept) would've been gloating if they did it, evidencing past anon-sanctioned actions.

You correctly explain the structure of anonymous (the concept) and then make the case that because Anon (the actual representative body) didn't claim credit, then they did not do it.

I just don't understand how you guys can correctly identify what anonymous is in one sentence, but then treat it like they all know what each other is doing in the next.

1. However if I was on the security team of Sony... come on now, use your head some, no need for me to spell it out for you.

2. My statements are not mutually exclusive, and therefore your entire point is absolutely void, yet again. You just have to look at the most recent Gawker Network deal to see what I mean by Anon gloating. Or the part wehre the completely fucked that one security firm. Or the one where they fucked the DDoSing anti-piracy company in India. The list keeps going and going.