theprof00 said:
No one's refuting that point. I agree. I'm responding to the bolded (which I just bolded). Just because something has a known vulnerablity, it doesn't mean just anyone can get the info, and it doesn't even mean that good hackers can get the info. I'm just saying that "known vulnerability" implies nothing more than the words themselves. It is a vulnerability that is known. Just because something is described as "outdated" and "vulnerable", it doesn't relate to anything more than equal opposite force. Like your example, the Death Star has that tunnel because the core needs to have ventilation. It must exist. What they can do, is put turrets all around it, and make it near impossible to get at. However, every once in a while a superhero is able to break in and wreck house. Understand? The builders knew the vulnerability was there, but did not expect a a hero with a Darth Vader level of force ability would do that. Again, I'm not saying a superhuman did the hack. I'm saying "known vulnerability" can just as much imply superhuman efforts, as toddler effort. Let's not let "partisan biases" morph this story into a series of exaggerations. |
well that vent, all they had to do was put up a few random bars in the tunnel, or have it turn once in a while.
so even if they get past all the turrets and what not else that made it SEEMINGLY IMPOSSIBLE to get to, there is still a fail safe in teh end of the missile hitting bars or the vent shaft turning so it hits a wall.
if sony knw of a potential vulnerability, they can as you said make it damn near impossible to get to, but nothing is impossible. BUT THEN have a fail safe, such as ENCRYPTING the data. If my memory serves correct, wasn't the data all just sitting there in non-encrypted form?







