| Linkasf said: Look, The conduit was not that good. Just like Red Steel, the name and image of it wasn't good after the first one was released and making a sequel to it would be a horrible idea, which is what Ubi soft ended up doing and resulting in crappy sales because of the reception of the first game. In the Conduit 2s case, it is similar the way I see it. High Voltage should have made a completely different game that is NOT Conduit. People know that the first one wasnt that good and would imagine that the 2nd one is just as bad. HVS should seriously think, the Conduit brand just isnt strong at all and wasn't built well to begin with. Using a weak brand twice in a row is asking for bad sales. The way I see it, if HVS wanted to create a stronger brand out of the conduit, they should have waited till the next batch of consoles and really change the game from the ground up. |
RS2 wouldn't have caught on anyway. I have the game, and it's decent, but not a classic.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs
