By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

You say so much and source so little

 

Examples of companies that believe that my argument is correct

EA - http://www.develop-online.net/news/37298/Nintendo-must-heed-third-party-warning-EA-says

Nintendo - http://www.next-gen.biz/features/gdc-iwata-how-succeed-wii-ds

Ubisoft - http://au.gamespot.com/forums/topic/26027796/ubisoft-well-have-nintendo-like-quality-on-the-wii-in-2008?page=0

Miyamoto-san himself “If there’s only one piece of advice that I could give to the managers of third party companies, it would be that a lot of times it seems that when they’re putting games out on Nintendo hardware, those games are being developed by their third-string team or their fourth-string team. Maybe that’s because they see those products as being unique projects or somewhat smaller-scale projects. But when Nintendo puts out a title that is designed to really support and sell its hardware, that title is always developed by one of our number one teams. And so I think that when it comes to the question of trying to compete with our software, I would really like to see them try to do that with their number one teams rather than with the third- or fourth-string teams.” 

 

Can you please provide a link to why you think third parties aren't supporting the Wii based on its power, or how Nintendo believe this to be the case.