| Kenryoku_Maxis said: Alright dude, you 'won'. Despite the fact that I previously said, in every post no doubt, that these are just my opiniond and entirely subjective. And I'd also like to point out you're comparing all my examples to metacritic, which we previously both stated was inaccurate. Hence why I'm not really bothering to bring up counter examples to all these points. That and I already admitted that reviews themselves differ from site to site and are entirely subjective (see a trend here?) |
So then what are you comparing them to? What 'average' are you comparing GT to when you say it is low? Metacritic isn't perfect, but my complaints were more directed at the user reviews. Any review aggregator will have the same issues, so why bring up averages at all?
There is a pretty big difference between saying 'I think Kirby deserved higher scores' and claiming that certain sites were biased against certain games when the evidence doesn't support that. It doesn't help when one of the sites you claimed was biased all of a sudden had been good for the past couple years in a later post. Or when a 'low' score for MH or TvC goes from a bias against the Wii to a bias against the type of game.
