Yakuzaice said:
If you actually have a problem with a certain review on a certain site, then support it with evidence. Don't just fall back on the 'reviewers hate the Wii' argument that we've been heaing for years. Let's take a look at those three. IGN, Gamespot, and Gametrailers Kirby Donkey Kong AC: Brotherhood Yes, curse those biased assholes. If only they'd give Wii games a fair chance! Oh wait..... As for Metacritic, Donkey Kong has no Critic reviews under 70, and only 3 user reviews under 70. Kirby has two critic reviews under 70 (two 60's) and the same for the user reviews. I wouldn't say either of these games have had users or critics intentionally trying to bring the score down with onscenely low scores. |
I really don't weant to belabor this point. But basically, you're cherry picking. Assassins Creed I and II both got 9.4 and 9.5 respectively on GameTrailers. Brotherhood probably got a 9.0 because it was deemed 'good but more of the same'.
But remember my main point. Aside from a handful of games (10 or so that I can count), all Wii games avg below 9.0. Even some thatare deemed for the 'core' gamer like Muramasa, New Super Mario Bros Wii, Epic Mickey, Tatsunoko vs. Capcom and Monster Hunter Tri. And a lot of the top rated games on Wii are ports of older games (Okami, Metroid Prime Trilogy, Resident Evil 4, World of Goo, etc). But anyweay...if you don't precieve a downsocre for Wii games, I don't really need to change your mind.
Also, I really shouldn't have brought up Gamespot. They give so many games a generic 8.5....











