noname2200 on 28 April 2011
I love this thread. It's so fascinating to see who's willing to go to bat for their team. 
Anyhow, it might surprise some of you to know that there seems to be a case here. Many of the plaintiff's claims are laughable (Song-Bev? CLRA? Really?), but Sony has indisputably failed in its legal duty to warn consumers of the security breach (Cal. Civ. Code sec. 1798.82., Seventh cause of action listed), and it may have had inadequate security measures in places (I don't know enough to be certain). If the plaintiffs can prove damages from this breach of duty...
