By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mr Khan said:
axt113 said:
ZaP~ said:

@axt113

It's impressive how you continue with what you believe.

I won't even try to counter your points of view, the trees don't let you see the forest. But i disagree your way of thinking, hands down.


ou can disagree with me, but you can;t disagree with the fact that Wii has declined and 3DS has ben underwhelming to say the least and that Nintendo has done it to themselves

The second point is debatable in light of past performance (namely the predecessor to the device in question), but rather most of us are flabbergasted by this extremist philosophy that there is only 1 proper kind of game to make, and all else is just waste. We could make a discussion regarding how Nintendo might have better paced their software distribution across this generation, certainly, but while there are these fundamental disagreements (and this seemingly endless scorn being heaped upon them), the Malstromites cannot hold discourse with the non-Malstromites. I shall repeat my previous declaration of "Screw You Guys, I'm Going Home," and shunt from my field of vision all who zealously profess this virulent vitriol, for the sake of preserving my sanity and retaining any semblance of enjoyment as i peruse VGChartz


I didn;t say there is only one type of game to make, if you think that you misunderstand me, I am saying that many games should be made, but the should follow successful ideals, you can make meaty fare from the ideals in WSR and Wii Fit, you can make games that capture the old school feel of games, easier to pickup and play but lots of fun in a similar vein to NSMB, I'm not saying just make NSMB only, I'm saying don't waste  time on dead ends like 3D Mario and Other M and Skyward Sword, when better games can be made using the ideals of actual success