superchunk said:
Guess my post was biased towards how I think about stuff as I consider myself a general gamer. It doesn't matter that its Nintendo system, more so that's its a new system that no one really knows anything factual about. All we have is rumors that, to me, would lead a lot of gamers to be very interested in seeing the outcome. Especially considering all the buzz its getting, I think that assumption is right. So, for someone to not be most hyped to see this new console seems to me to not be a gamer but more of a Playstation or 360 gamer/fanboy. For someone to not be interested because its "Nintendo" and that Nintendo is a certain way no matter what. However, had this been a Sony or MS set or rumors (based solely on their fanboy allegance) they'd be hyped. Well, newsflash, if this is as powerful as rumored with the features given, it will have not only Nintendo games, but also all the same games PS360 get.... albeit prettier (as its more powerful with more technologies) and potentially with better local multiplayer as well as enhanced for the controller screen which could be really awesome. So deciding that this is for you while baseing solely on Nintendo name is absurd at this point and, to me, a sign of being a fanboy. |
I was nice and ignored it in the first post, but you just keep doing it so here's your warning. Don't go calling everyone in a thread that disagrees with you a fanboy. You're talking in generals so I wouldn't call it directly insulting but you know it's flamebait to do something like that and you're just trying to piss off anyone who thinks differently than you (a quest you have succeeded in btw). So cut it out, if you make another post like that I'll have to ban you.
edit: and to everyone else, consider this line of conversation dealt with and move on, I don't want this to dominate the thread.
...









